Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • The Process Committee facilitates the QIBA Coordinating Committees and their profiling * Quarterly agenda topic: What to highlight during next CC call slots. See [[Process Education]] for potential topics.
    35 KB (5,482 words) - 16:22, 17 January 2024
  • *** Draft text for review by the Biomarker Committee * '''Process Committee''' is established by and reports to the Steering Committee
    9 KB (1,229 words) - 17:31, 15 January 2021
  • ...oring Groups are required to oversee the various developmental stages from Draft to Public Comment to Consensus based on the current QUIC endorsement criter ...ing Group'' follows the '''[[Review Process]]''' to review and approve the draft for Public Comment publication
    6 KB (851 words) - 16:57, 19 January 2024
  • * When you copy a chunk of text from your original, highlight it * When you are "finished" extraction, you can check the un-highlighted text to see if you have missed migrating anything important
    2 KB (301 words) - 21:46, 1 August 2012
  • ...ons that may affect your performance for this biomarker. It will help you draft or modify your current procedures, whether you are using those in research, ...t been vetted externally; the profile text may change during the Consensus process.
    4 KB (670 words) - 20:11, 19 July 2022
  • * When you copy a chunk of text from your original, highlight it * When you are "finished" extraction, you can check the un-highlighted text to see if you have missed migrating anything important
    946 bytes (151 words) - 20:50, 12 July 2012
  • '''DRAFT - wording and content both open to change''' - ''if reading for the first t ...E.g. no groundwork per se, no consensus process, no technical confirmation process, etc.>''
    6 KB (985 words) - 22:59, 28 August 2020