2022-08-02 Process Committee Agenda

Meeting Info

Join Zoom Meeting: https://rsna-org.zoom.us/j/81919397380?pwd=SGd3aHhocXJ4UzczNDVsTkdobXFodz09

Meeting ID: 898 7717 5730 | Passcode: Process

Process Coordinating Committee page

Agenda

Profile Editor Meetings [10 min]

• Discuss logistics of starting up in (late August?, early Sept?)
• Invite 4-6 editors from currently active BCs (esp. those trying out the new template)
• Start with introduction of template and open discussion of issues/questions
• Key: Kevin, Mike

Maintenance/Versioning/Naming [20 min]

• Homework: Kevin to write up "components" of name
• Focus on what (each component of) the name communicates to external audience.
• Consider how to survey/focus-group some end users to see what makes sense
• Note adjacent issue of Stage 3 naming
• Note adjacent issue of file naming and coordination with RSNA staff

• Will eventually reach out to CC Cochairs on versioning (noting it's not concrete yet, still cloud of ideas)
• Key: MRE (Kay), FDG (Gudrun will ask Jeff to recommend), DWI (Mike)

Stage 3 Naming [10 min]

• Review/discuss recent survey results and leadership discussions
• Mike: Want to "get it right" (both this and version naming)

Estimates_of_Precision [15 min]

• Plans for Wrapping-up
• Q1. For a BC that is drafting their Stage 4 experimental plan, what about Estimates of Precision do they need to understand/address?
• Q2. For a Stage 4 profile, what conformance requirements and assessment procedures should the BC place on sites (e.g. relating to estimating precision or demonstrating non-inferiority)?

• Note: since we want to know if the requirement & assessment procedures will be practical, the BC will have to include them in the Stage 3 profile

• Q3. For a BC that is not preparing Stage 4, but wants to provide an experimental plan so that a motivated site can take a Stage 3 Profile to Stage 4 themselves, what should they write?
• Key: Nancy

BONUS Topic: Profile Selection Process [min]

• Start discussion to feed into the QIBA Meetings

• There are more things that QIBA could conceivably work on than we have the bandwidth to actually work on.
• How do we determine a proposal is the best use of our time rather than a conceivable use of our time.
• Which characteristics of past profiles have set the stage for success and which have set the stage for roadblocks?
• How can we look for those in new proposals?

Next Meeting Agenda & New Business [10 min]

• See also New Topics