Difference between revisions of "Talk:Review Process"

From QIBA Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Blanked the page)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
__NOTOC__
 
−
<Proposed Update>
 
  
−
Prior to publishing a Public Comment Profile, a Consensus Profile, a Technically Confirmed Profile, Claim Confirmed Profile or a Clinically Confirmed Profile:
 
−
* The review and approval process is the same
 
−
* '''[[QIBA Profile Stages|The criteria differ depending on the stage]]'''
 
−
 
−
 
−
Remember, this is the QA point.  It doesn't have to be perfect.  '''It does have to be good'''.
 
−
 
−
==Review (Biomarker Committee)==
 
−
The following review process is not required but is strongly recommended.
 
−
* Authors/Editor of the Profile request pre-approval review once they feel work on the current stage has been completed
 
−
* Biomarker Committee assigns/recruits reviewers for Profile sections
 
−
** Ideally each section should be covered by more than one reviewer
 
−
** Reviewing assignments can be divided up any way that is convenient
 
−
** It doesn't hurt to have some reviewers read through the profile in its entirety (finds inconsistencies/gaps)
 
−
* Reviewers check the Profile meets the '''[[QIBA Profile Stages|criteria for the stage]]''' as well as general clarity/quality
 
−
** A two week window for the reviewers to do their work is suggested
 
−
* Reviewers report back to the Biomarker Committee
 
−
* The Authors and Biomarker Committee resolve any questions/comments/clarifications raised by the reviewers
 
−
 
−
==Approve (Biomarker Committee)==
 
−
* The Secretariat circulates a [[Balloting Process|Ballot]] asking Biomarker Committee members to approve that the content of the Profile meets the '''[[QIBA Profile Stages|criteria for the stage]]'''
 
−
** Generally the ballot period should be several weeks to allow time to review the full Profile text
 
−
** In the case of approving to publish for Public Comment, it is acceptable to instead hold a vote during a committee meeting.
 
−
 
−
==Approve (Modality Coordinating Committee)==
 
−
* A [[Voting Privileges|Vote]] in committee (for Public Comment) or [[Balloting Process|Ballot]] (for Consensus, Technically Confirmed, Claim Confirmed or Clinically Confirmed) to approve the document as fit for the next phase.
 

Latest revision as of 17:44, 9 November 2016

Retrieved from "https://qibawiki.rsna.org/index.php?title=Talk:Review_Process&oldid=10460"