Difference between revisions of "Talk:Review Process"

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-__NOTOC__
-<Proposed Update>
-Prior to publishing a Public Comment Profile, a Consensus Profile, a Technically Confirmed Profile, Claim Confirmed Profile or a Clinically Confirmed Profile:
-* The review and approval process is the same
-* '''[[QIBA Profile Stages|The criteria differ depending on the stage]]'''
-Remember, this is the QA point.  It doesn't have to be perfect.  '''It does have to be good'''.
-==Review (Biomarker Committee)==
-The following review process is not required but is strongly recommended.
-* Authors/Editor of the Profile request content review once they feel work on the current stage has been completed
-* Biomarker Committee assigns/recruits reviewers for Profile sections
-** Ideally each section should be covered by more than one reviewer
-** Reviewing assignments can be divided up any way that is convenient
-** It is helpful to have some reviewers read through the profile in its entirety (finds inconsistencies/gaps)
-* Reviewers check the Profile meets the '''[[QIBA Profile Stages|criteria for the stage]]''' as well as general clarity/quality
-** A two week window for the reviewers to do their work is suggested
-* Reviewers report back to the Biomarker Committee
-* The Authors and Biomarker Committee resolve any questions/comments/clarifications raised by the reviewers
-==Approve (Biomarker Committee)==
-* The Secretariat circulates a '''[[Balloting Process|Ballot]]''' asking Biomarker Committee members to approve that the content of the Profile meets the '''[[QIBA Profile Stages|criteria for the stage]]'''
-** Generally the ballot period should be 2-4 weeks to allow time to review the full Profile text
-** In the case of approving to publish for Public Comment, it is acceptable to instead hold a vote during a committee meeting.
-==Approve (Modality Coordinating Committee)==
-* The Biomarker Committee provides the details of the ballot (highlighting any unresolved ballot comments) and requests approval to publish from the Coordinating Committee
-** Note that some Coordinating Committees only meet once every several months so the Biomarker Committee is advised to check on that to avoid missing a window
-* The Coordinating Committee puts the approval question on the agenda for a [[Voting Privileges|Vote]] in committee at an upcoming meeting.
-** Since there is a lengthy document involved, the agenda notification should be circulated at least 2 weeks before the meeting.
-** <Add note that the CC may choose to do a ballot if that would be faster than waiting for the next meeting>

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Review Process"

Latest revision as of 17:44, 9 November 2016

Navigation menu

Search