Difference between revisions of "Standardized Uptake Value (SUV)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==QIBA FDG-PET/CT Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) Technical Subcommittee Charge== | ==QIBA FDG-PET/CT Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) Technical Subcommittee Charge== | ||
| − | The '''objective of this subcommittee''' is to | + | The '''objective of this subcommittee''' is to define how to calculate SUV in a consistent manner regardeless of manufacturer, model and version of scanner and workstation. |
'''Completed:''' | '''Completed:''' | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*Collected answers from vendors to questionnaires along with other submitted SUV calculation documents | *Collected answers from vendors to questionnaires along with other submitted SUV calculation documents | ||
*Described generalized SUV calculation method with vendor-specific variants | *Described generalized SUV calculation method with vendor-specific variants | ||
| + | |||
| + | The previously described objective of building a common reference DICOM test image that can be generated by each scanner and read on PET DICOM display stations to check information fidelity is the subject of separate the Digital Reference Object (DRO) project [[media::12-month_12a_report_QIBA_FDG-PETCT_DRO_final_report_v3.pdf]]. | ||
==SUV Calculation== | ==SUV Calculation== | ||
Revision as of 12:02, 2 October 2012
Back to FDG-PET
QIBA FDG-PET/CT Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) Technical Subcommittee Charge
The objective of this subcommittee is to define how to calculate SUV in a consistent manner regardeless of manufacturer, model and version of scanner and workstation.
Completed:
- Collected DICOM PET/CT images of the same reference phantom from scanners from GE, Philips, Siemens
- Image data collated and compared to DICOM header information
- Collected answers from vendors to questionnaires along with other submitted SUV calculation documents
- Described generalized SUV calculation method with vendor-specific variants
The previously described objective of building a common reference DICOM test image that can be generated by each scanner and read on PET DICOM display stations to check information fidelity is the subject of separate the Digital Reference Object (DRO) project [[media::12-month_12a_report_QIBA_FDG-PETCT_DRO_final_report_v3.pdf]].
SUV Calculation
Letter to vendors requesting detailed SUV computation description
- Media:QIBA_FDG_Vendor_SUV_20081103_DAC.doc Letter sent to vendors
- Media:QIBA_FDG_Vendor_SUV_20081103_DAC_JTY.doc Letter with additional questions from Jeff Yap
Vendor responses on SUV computation
- Philips - Media:QIBA_FDG_Vendor_SUV_Philips.doc
Other Working Documents
Subcommittee Call Summaries
- 11.05.2009 FDG-PET/CT SUV Subcommittee Call Summary
- 09.30.2009 FDG-PET/CT SUV Subcommittee Call Summary
- 08.06.2009 FDG-PET/CT SUV Subcommittee Call Summary
- 04.17.2009 FDG-PET/CT DRO Subcommittee Call Summary
- 03.27.2009 FDG-PET/CT DRO Subcommittee Call Summary
- 03.13.2009 FDG-PET/CT DRO Subcommittee Call Summary
SUV Subcommittee Members
- Paul Kinahan, PhD, Subcommittee Co-chair <kinahan@u.washington.edu>
- David Clunie, MBBS, Subcommittee Co-chair <dclunie@radpharm.com>
- Ronald Boellaard, PhD <r.boellaard@vumc.nl>
- Michael Casey, PhD <michael.e.casey@siemens.com>
- Paul E. Christian <Paul.Christian@hci.utah.edu>
- Patricia E. Cole, PhD, MD <patriciaellencole@gmail.com>
- Simon DeBruin, MSEE <sdebruin@segamicorp.com>
- John M. Hoffman, MD <john.hoffman@hci.utah.edu>
- Steve Kohlmyer <Steve.Kohlmyer@med.ge.com>
- Piotr Maniawski <piotr.maniawski@philips.com>
- Dennis Nelson, PhD <dnelson@mimvista.com>
- Eric S. Perlman, MD <perlman@radpharm.com>
- Ling X. Shao, PhD, <ling.shao@philips.com>
- John G. Wolodzko, PhD <wolodzko@radpharm.com>
- Jeffrey Yap, PhD <Jeffrey_Yap@dfci.harvard.edu>
- Brian Zimmerman, PhD <bez@nist.gov>