Difference between revisions of "Software Version Tracking"

From QIBA Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
==QIBA FDG-PET/CT Technical Subcommittee Charge==
 
==QIBA FDG-PET/CT Technical Subcommittee Charge==
 +
 +
 +
*The objective of the subcommittee is to track the traceability of SW version of a PET/CT system to ensure the consistency of quantitative output throughout the trial
 +
*Rationale: Due to the continuous improvements of current PET/CT systems, vendors will upgrade software in different part of sub-systems from time to time for the same system. Some of upgrades will include quantitation improvements.
 +
 +
*Essential SW to be tracked: Three major SW in the quantitative imaging chain should be tracked: Acquisition (include detector), Reconstruction (may be combined with acquisition) and Quantitation Tool*
 +
*Approach:
 +
*Current: Manual Tracking (available now);
 +
*5-8 Years: Fully DICOM Tracking (New DICOM attributes needed);
 +
*8 Years and Beyond: One-button SW Tracking Function (Industry guideline - vendors to do it)
 +
*Note: * Some sites use third party Display/Quantitative Tools, which further complicate the tracking 
 +
 +
1.Current: Manual Tracking
 +
*Status: Currently, every vendor should have the ability of obtaining the version info for each software program/application installed.
 +
*Action: Send out a survey to vendors for instructions to check the SW version (Acquisition, Reconstruction, Quantitative Tool. Some vendors provide multiple reconstruction methods)
 +
 +
2.Fully DICOM  Tracking (5-8 Years)
 +
*Status: Currently only the attribute for acquisition SW version may exist
 +
*Action: Work with other committees to define a global recommended list of DICOM attributes needed for quantitation purpose
 +
*Working with DICOM committee to define the timeline for implementing the list
 +
 +
3.One-button SW Tracking Function (8 Years and Beyond)
 +
*Status: Currently, vendors provide tools to view all/most DICOM Info, but, most info which impact quantitation are missing (No DICOM Attributes): The goal is for vendors to provide a one-button function in the quantitative tool to display all quantitative related info.
 +
*Action:
 +
1.Define what are the quantitative info to be recorded (DICOM)
 +
2.Develop guidelines (working with NEMA ?)
 +
3.Compliance Steps
 +
  
 
==Subcommittee Members==
 
==Subcommittee Members==
 +
 +
*Ling X. Shao, PhD, Subcommittee Chair (ling.shao@philips.com)
 +
  
 
==Working Documents==
 
==Working Documents==
  
 
==Subcommittee Call Summaries==
 
==Subcommittee Call Summaries==

Revision as of 20:35, 9 March 2009

Back to FDG-PET

QIBA FDG-PET/CT Technical Subcommittee Charge

  • The objective of the subcommittee is to track the traceability of SW version of a PET/CT system to ensure the consistency of quantitative output throughout the trial
  • Rationale: Due to the continuous improvements of current PET/CT systems, vendors will upgrade software in different part of sub-systems from time to time for the same system. Some of upgrades will include quantitation improvements.
  • Essential SW to be tracked: Three major SW in the quantitative imaging chain should be tracked: Acquisition (include detector), Reconstruction (may be combined with acquisition) and Quantitation Tool*
  • Approach:
  • Current: Manual Tracking (available now);
  • 5-8 Years: Fully DICOM Tracking (New DICOM attributes needed);
  • 8 Years and Beyond: One-button SW Tracking Function (Industry guideline - vendors to do it)
  • Note: * Some sites use third party Display/Quantitative Tools, which further complicate the tracking

1.Current: Manual Tracking

  • Status: Currently, every vendor should have the ability of obtaining the version info for each software program/application installed.
  • Action: Send out a survey to vendors for instructions to check the SW version (Acquisition, Reconstruction, Quantitative Tool. Some vendors provide multiple reconstruction methods)

2.Fully DICOM Tracking (5-8 Years)

  • Status: Currently only the attribute for acquisition SW version may exist
  • Action: Work with other committees to define a global recommended list of DICOM attributes needed for quantitation purpose
  • Working with DICOM committee to define the timeline for implementing the list

3.One-button SW Tracking Function (8 Years and Beyond)

  • Status: Currently, vendors provide tools to view all/most DICOM Info, but, most info which impact quantitation are missing (No DICOM Attributes): The goal is for vendors to provide a one-button function in the quantitative tool to display all quantitative related info.
  • Action:

1.Define what are the quantitative info to be recorded (DICOM) 2.Develop guidelines (working with NEMA ?) 3.Compliance Steps


Subcommittee Members

  • Ling X. Shao, PhD, Subcommittee Chair (ling.shao@philips.com)


Working Documents

Subcommittee Call Summaries