Difference between revisions of "Software Version Tracking"

From QIBA Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 34: Line 34:
  
 
*'''Ling X. Shao, PhD''', Subcommittee Chair <ling.shao@philips.com>
 
*'''Ling X. Shao, PhD''', Subcommittee Chair <ling.shao@philips.com>
 +
*Michael E. Casey, PhD, <michael.e.casey@siemens.com>
 +
*Steve Kohlmyer <Steve.Kohlmyer@med.ge.com>
  
 +
==Working Documents==
  
==Working Documents==
+
*[[Media:Dr-Shao-QIBA SW Ver Tracking 3-13-09.ppt.pdf|QIBA Software Version Tracking 03-13-2009]]
  
 
==Subcommittee Call Summaries==
 
==Subcommittee Call Summaries==
 +
 +
*[[Media:10.15.2009 QIBA FDG-PET SW Call Summary-FINAL.pdf|10.15.2009 FDG-PET/CT Software Version Tracking Subctte Call Summary]]
 +
*[[Media:05.12.2009 QIBA FDG-PET SW Call Summary-FINAL.pdf|05.12.2009 FDG-PET/CT Software Version Tracking Subctte Call Summary]]
 +
*[[Media:03.10.2009 QIBA FDG-PET SW Call Summary-FINAL.pdf|03.10.2009 FDG-PET/CT Software Version Tracking Subctte Call Summary]]

Latest revision as of 16:41, 9 November 2009

Back to FDG-PET

QIBA FDG-PET/CT Software Version Tracking Technical Subcommittee Charge

  • The objective of the subcommittee is to track the traceability of SW version of a PET/CT system to ensure the consistency of quantitative output throughout the trial
  • Rationale: Due to the continuous improvements of current PET/CT systems, vendors will upgrade software in different part of sub-systems from time to time for the same system. Some of upgrades will include quantitation improvements.
  • Essential SW to be tracked: Three major SW in the quantitative imaging chain should be tracked: Acquisition (include detector), Reconstruction (may be combined with acquisition) and Quantitation Tool*
  • Approach:
  • Current: Manual Tracking (available now);
  • 5-8 Years: Fully DICOM Tracking (New DICOM attributes needed);
  • 8 Years and Beyond: One-button SW Tracking Function (Industry guideline - vendors to do it)
  • Note: * Some sites use third party Display/Quantitative Tools, which further complicate the tracking

1. Current: Manual Tracking

  • Status: Currently, every vendor should have the ability of obtaining the version info for each software program/application installed.

Action: Send out a survey to vendors for instructions to check the SW version (Acquisition, Reconstruction, Quantitative Tool. Some vendors provide multiple reconstruction methods)

2. Fully DICOM Tracking (5-8 Years)

  • Status: Currently only the attribute for acquisition SW version may exist
  • Action: Work with other committees to define a global recommended list of DICOM attributes needed for quantitation purpose
  • Working with DICOM committee to define the timeline for implementing the list

3. One-button SW Tracking Function (8 Years and Beyond)

  • Status: Currently, vendors provide tools to view all/most DICOM Info, but, most info which impact quantitation are missing (No DICOM Attributes): The goal is for vendors to provide a one-button function in the quantitative tool to display all quantitative related info.

*Action:

  • 1.Define what are the quantitative info to be recorded (DICOM)
  • 2.Develop guidelines (working with NEMA ?)
  • 3.Compliance Steps


Subcommittee Members

  • Ling X. Shao, PhD, Subcommittee Chair <ling.shao@philips.com>
  • Michael E. Casey, PhD, <michael.e.casey@siemens.com>
  • Steve Kohlmyer <Steve.Kohlmyer@med.ge.com>

Working Documents

Subcommittee Call Summaries