Review Process

From QIBA Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The same review and approval process occurs prior to releasing a Public Comment Draft, a Reviewed Draft, or a Tested Draft. Just the criteria change.

Remember, this is the QA point. It doesn't have to be perfect. It does have to be good.

Review and Approval

  • Judge the document to be fit for the next phase (Technical Committee)
    • Schedule review meeting(s) as needed with open committee
    • Submit document 1 week before review meeting
    • Line-by-line review/walkthrough led by editor
    • Resolve questions/comments/clarifications
    • Vote (for Public Comment) or Ballot (for Reviewed or Tested) to approve the document as fit for the next phase.

Criteria for publishing Public Comment draft

  • All open issues have been clearly listed
  • Some groundwork projects may be underway
  • Candidate resolutions have been selected for most/all issues and drafted into the Profile
  • All major mechanisms and profile details are mostly clear/complete enough to implement
  • It is clear what is required for a system/organization to claim compliance with the Profile
  • Compliance requirements are sufficient to accomplish the goal of the profile

Criteria for publishing Reviewed draft

  • All open issues have been resolved
  • Few, if any, groundwork projects remain active
  • All major mechanisms and profile details are clear/complete enough to implement
  • All major mechanisms have been tested in one or more groundwork or referenced studies (although reasonable deviations from Profile details may exist)
  • It is clear what is required for a system/organization to claim compliance with the Profile
  • Compliance requirements are sufficient to accomplish the goal of the profile

Criteria for publishing Technically Confirmed draft

  • All major mechanisms and profile details have been tested as written
  • Groundwork projects are complete
  • All major mechanisms and profile details have been implemented by at least one system/site.
  • The claim of the profile has been accomplished in "controlled" conditions

Criteria for publishing Clinically Confirmed draft

  • All major mechanisms and profile details have been tested in the field as written
  • All major mechanisms and profile details have been "widely" implemented by multiple systems/sites
  • It is clear what is required for a system/organization to claim compliance with the Profile
  • The goal of the profile has been accomplished in clinical conditions