Review Process

From QIBA Wiki
Revision as of 02:55, 28 January 2011 by Kevino (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

It's basically the same review process prior to releasing for Trial Implementation or Publication (and if we want to be good, before Public Comment).

Remember, this is the QA point. It doesn't have to be perfect. It does have to be good.

Review and Approval

  • Judge the document to be fit for the next phase (Authoring Committee)
  • Schedule review meeting with Modality Committee
  • Submit document 1 week before review meeting (Authoring Committee)
  • Line-by-line review (Modality Committee)
    • Walkthrough led by lead author
    • Resolve questions/comments/clarifications from Modality Committee
  • Record vote to approve the document as fit for the next phase (Modality Committee)

Criteria for Public Comment

Criteria for Trial Implementation

Criteria for Publication