Difference between revisions of "Review Process"

From QIBA Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
 +
It's basically the same review process prior to releasing for Trial Implementation or Publication (and if we want to be good, before Public Comment).
 +
 +
Remember, this is the QA point.  It doesn't have to be perfect.  It does have to be good.
  
  
Line 7: Line 11:
 
** Walkthrough led by lead author
 
** Walkthrough led by lead author
 
** Resolve questions/comments/clarifications from Modality Committee
 
** Resolve questions/comments/clarifications from Modality Committee
* Recorded vote to approve ('''Modality Committee''')
+
* Recorded vote to approve the document as fit for the next phase ('''Modality Committee''')

Revision as of 02:46, 28 January 2011

It's basically the same review process prior to releasing for Trial Implementation or Publication (and if we want to be good, before Public Comment).

Remember, this is the QA point. It doesn't have to be perfect. It does have to be good.


  • Judge the document to be fit for the next phase (Authoring Committee)
  • Schedule review meeting with Modality Committee
  • Submit document 1 week before review meeting (Authoring Committee)
  • Line-by-line review (Modality Committee)
    • Walkthrough led by lead author
    • Resolve questions/comments/clarifications from Modality Committee
  • Recorded vote to approve the document as fit for the next phase (Modality Committee)