Difference between revisions of "Process Coordinating Committee"

From QIBA Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Current Work)
(Current Work)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
==Current Work==
 
==Current Work==
 
:* Complete Claim Guidance document
 
:* Complete Claim Guidance document
 +
::* Nancy will review the current PPT and come up with descriptions of the terms Negligible, Known, Unknown, etc.
 +
::* Nancy will start to turn the notes in the current document into proper text.  Kevin will review. Questions/clarifications will be brought to cmte.
 
:* Process/best practices for initial literature search around a new biomarker/profile
 
:* Process/best practices for initial literature search around a new biomarker/profile
 
::* Does someone have a draft set of guidance to kick this off? (Nancy, Anna Wu, Hendrik Lau, Andy)
 
::* Does someone have a draft set of guidance to kick this off? (Nancy, Anna Wu, Hendrik Lau, Andy)
Line 23: Line 25:
 
::* Also meta-analysis guidance to determine sources and levels of variance
 
::* Also meta-analysis guidance to determine sources and levels of variance
 
:* [[QIBA Wiki Improvements]]
 
:* [[QIBA Wiki Improvements]]
:* On-boarding/indoctrination process and materials for new committees and members
+
:* On-boarding process and materials for new committees and members
 
::* Joe's intro email, current template and stage docs, QIBA Fact Sheet
 
::* Joe's intro email, current template and stage docs, QIBA Fact Sheet
 
::* Could use a "fresh eyes"/newcomer commentary
 
::* Could use a "fresh eyes"/newcomer commentary
 +
:::* Dan will send the current Fact Sheet to UCSF for feedback on contents
 +
:::* Kevin will work with Joe to get it into a Google Doc for revision and linking from the Wiki.
 
:* Support adoption of the updated Profile Template.
 
:* Support adoption of the updated Profile Template.
 
:* Sunset procedure for retiring Task Forces and Biomarker Committees that have completed their work.
 
:* Sunset procedure for retiring Task Forces and Biomarker Committees that have completed their work.

Revision as of 20:51, 24 August 2016

Chairs: Kevin O'Donnell (Chair); Dan Sullivan, MD (Vice-chair)
Secretary: Susan Weinmann (RSNA Staff)
Roster: <link to roster of active attendees and who has voting privileges>

Scope

The Process Committee facilitates the QIBA Coordinating Committees and their profiling activities by defining processes and tools to promote consistent quality work product.

  • Develop common Templates & Processes
  • Support & mentor adoption of above
  • Drive consistent content & format of Profiles
  • Support infrastructure for Committees

Meetings

Current Work

  • Complete Claim Guidance document
  • Nancy will review the current PPT and come up with descriptions of the terms Negligible, Known, Unknown, etc.
  • Nancy will start to turn the notes in the current document into proper text. Kevin will review. Questions/clarifications will be brought to cmte.
  • Process/best practices for initial literature search around a new biomarker/profile
  • Does someone have a draft set of guidance to kick this off? (Nancy, Anna Wu, Hendrik Lau, Andy)
  • Where do you store references, what kind of search works best, what exactly are you looking for?
  • Also meta-analysis guidance to determine sources and levels of variance
  • Joe's intro email, current template and stage docs, QIBA Fact Sheet
  • Could use a "fresh eyes"/newcomer commentary
  • Dan will send the current Fact Sheet to UCSF for feedback on contents
  • Kevin will work with Joe to get it into a Google Doc for revision and linking from the Wiki.
  • Support adoption of the updated Profile Template.
  • Sunset procedure for retiring Task Forces and Biomarker Committees that have completed their work.
  • Sketch up publication process for Official Docs (CC approval vote, send to RSNA Staff)
  • Write up Standard Approval Practices for committee documents
  • Quality check mechanism, voting mechanism
  • Start simple with this and add complexity only as needed.
  • Address relationship between wiki content (current, easy to update) and website content (authoritative, stable)
  • Likely RSNA staff will periodically mirror wiki content up onto the website; address this in publication process.
  • "How to develop a Profile" Guidance
  • Harmonize assessment procedures across profiles
  • Refine process for QIBA Conformance Statements
  • Should QIBA get into hosting the Conformance Statements on our site (and then we could link to them from the Profiles page which would be very handy)
  • Consider the RSNA Image Share Conformance Assessment Program and whether we should do something similar for QIBA
  • Process committee can think through the details of a process and confer with RSNA whether they would be interested
  • Propose conventions for Profile editions/versions
  • Methodology/Study Design guidance/requirements for achieving "Clinically Confirmed"
  • Propose policy/process to consider Prior Project completion when Steering Cmte reviews new Proposals from the same PI.
  • timing overlap of prior cycle completion period with new proposal period needs to be one considered.
  • possible solution would require final reports for prior COMPLETED funding cycles before considering a new project proposal
  • Propose change tracking process
  • Guidelines for Reference Implementations and commercial products in Profiles (underlying algorithm available, list all comers, non-commercial?, etc).
  • Guidelines for assessment procedures to vet SW in Profiles
  • Clarity QIBA Profile vs UPICT Protocol (Venn Diagram)

Working Documents

Claim Guidance

Profile Stages

Wiki Layout

See Also

This page is based on the Committee Template. Add any good ideas you have to the template.