Review Process
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The same review an approval process occurs prior to releasing a Public Comment Draft, a Reviewed, Draft, or a Tested Draft. Just the criteria change.
Remember, this is the QA point. It doesn't have to be perfect. It does have to be good.
Review and Approval
- Judge the document to be fit for the next phase (Technical Committee)
- Schedule review meeting(s) as needed with open committee
- Submit document 1 week before review meeting
- Line-by-line review/walkthrough led by editor
- Resolve questions/comments/clarifications
- Record vote to approve the document as fit for the next phase (as quorum of regular attender list maintained by RSNA staff)
Criteria for publishing Public Comment draft
- All open issues have been clearly listed
- Some groundwork projects may be underway
- Candidate resolutions have been selected for most/all issues and drafted into the Profile
- All major mechanisms and profile details are mostly clear/complete enough to implement
- It is clear what is required for a system/organization to claim compliance with the Profile
- Compliance requirements are sufficient to accomplish the goal of the profile
Criteria for publishing Reviewed draft
- Few, if any, groundwork projects remain active
- All major mechanisms and profile details are clear/complete enough to implement
- It is clear what is required for a system/organization to claim compliance with the Profile
- Compliance requirements are sufficient to accomplish the goal of the profile
Criteria for publishing Tested draft
- All open issues have been resolved
- All major mechanisms and profile details have been tested in the field
- Groundwork projects are complete
- All major mechanisms and profile details are clear/complete enough to implement
- It is clear what is required for a system/organization to claim compliance with the Profile
- Compliance requirements are sufficient to accomplish the goal of the profile