Committee Procedures: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Meeting Procedures== | |||
The goal is group consensus and the input and endorsement of imaging community stakeholders on major decisions. | |||
A record of committee decisions and rationale is necessary to be effective and learn. | |||
* ''Secretariat'' (RSNA) records minutes (call summaries) for committee meetings | |||
* ''Secretariat'' maintains '''[[Committees|rosters for each committee]]''' indicating which members currently have '''[[Voting Privileges]]''' | |||
** ''Members'' who believe their attendance record is in error should contact the secretariat, preferably before the meeting | |||
==Voting== | |||
Procedural decisions such as sending a document to ballot are voted on during meetings | |||
* ''Chairs'' accept motions, seconds, discussion, and then call for a vote (see Roberts Rules if you need to get more elaborate) | |||
* ''Members'' who have '''[[Voting Privileges]]''' count towards quorum and may vote | |||
* ''Chairs'' resolve negative votes and large numbers of abstentions per the '''[[Committee Procedures#Consensus Process|consensus process]]''' | |||
** details of the resolution discussion in the minutes is desirable | |||
* ''Secretariat'' records the motion, tally of those against/abstaining/in-favor, and the details of negative votes in the minutes | |||
==Email Ballot== | |||
Some decisions are put to ballot. This allows more deliberation on the subject material than a vote in committee. | |||
* ''Chairs'' submit the ballot question and length of the ballot period to the Secretariat | |||
** The ballot period may be specified by the particular procedure that calls for a ballot | |||
** It is generally not less than 14 days to allow for members away on vacation | |||
** If reviewing lengthy documents or collecting feedback within member organizations is involved 30 days or more is better. | |||
* ''Secretariat'' emails the ballot to all members with '''[[Voting Privileges]]''' on the committee making the decision | |||
** The secretariat may also email "active" members (e.g. attended any of the last 3 or 4 meetings) so those who believe their attendance record is in error can still go ahead and vote, then based on review of their attendance their ballot can be counted or discarded | |||
* ''Secretariat'' compiles the ballot responses and comments for the Chairs | |||
* ''Chairs'' ratify the resulting tally in the next committee meeting | |||
** this includes resolving negative votes and large numbers of abstentions per the consensus process | |||
* ''Secretariat'' records resolution results/rationale in the minutes | |||
==Consensus Process== | |||
As a group setting standards on behalf of a community, QIBA Committees actively pursue Consensus. | |||
* strictly speaking a vote/ballot can pass with a quorum of votes and a majority in favor, BUT | |||
** a '''negative vote results in further discussion''' | |||
*** '''understand the reason''' for each negative vote and '''attempt to find a compromise or resolution''' that often allows everyone to vote in favor | |||
*** if after due diligence exploring compromises it is not possible, the chairs can accept the majority finding and the negative voters have had a chance to have their say and register their issues into the minutes | |||
** a '''large number of abstentions''' also warrants discussion; it can indicate many people have: | |||
*** misgivings | |||
*** not been able to adequately evaluate the question | |||
==Committee Leadership== | ==Committee Leadership== | ||
* Coordinating Committees, Biomarker Committees and Task Forces are encouraged to have 2 or 3 leaders who are preferably drawn from diverse backgrounds (Researchers, Clinicians, Physicists, Vendors, Regulators, etc.) | * Coordinating Committees, Biomarker Committees and Task Forces are encouraged to have 2 or 3 leaders who are preferably drawn from diverse backgrounds (Researchers, Clinicians, Physicists, Vendors, Regulators, etc.) | ||
** If not possible, committees are permitted to have some concentration but should discuss plans to expand stakeholder representation at least annually | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
* [[Committees|QIBA Committees]] | * [[Committees|QIBA Committees]] | ||
Revision as of 05:14, 7 March 2018
Meeting Procedures
The goal is group consensus and the input and endorsement of imaging community stakeholders on major decisions.
A record of committee decisions and rationale is necessary to be effective and learn.
- Secretariat (RSNA) records minutes (call summaries) for committee meetings
- Secretariat maintains rosters for each committee indicating which members currently have Voting Privileges
- Members who believe their attendance record is in error should contact the secretariat, preferably before the meeting
Voting
Procedural decisions such as sending a document to ballot are voted on during meetings
- Chairs accept motions, seconds, discussion, and then call for a vote (see Roberts Rules if you need to get more elaborate)
- Members who have Voting Privileges count towards quorum and may vote
- Chairs resolve negative votes and large numbers of abstentions per the consensus process
- details of the resolution discussion in the minutes is desirable
- Secretariat records the motion, tally of those against/abstaining/in-favor, and the details of negative votes in the minutes
Email Ballot
Some decisions are put to ballot. This allows more deliberation on the subject material than a vote in committee.
- Chairs submit the ballot question and length of the ballot period to the Secretariat
- The ballot period may be specified by the particular procedure that calls for a ballot
- It is generally not less than 14 days to allow for members away on vacation
- If reviewing lengthy documents or collecting feedback within member organizations is involved 30 days or more is better.
- Secretariat emails the ballot to all members with Voting Privileges on the committee making the decision
- The secretariat may also email "active" members (e.g. attended any of the last 3 or 4 meetings) so those who believe their attendance record is in error can still go ahead and vote, then based on review of their attendance their ballot can be counted or discarded
- Secretariat compiles the ballot responses and comments for the Chairs
- Chairs ratify the resulting tally in the next committee meeting
- this includes resolving negative votes and large numbers of abstentions per the consensus process
- Secretariat records resolution results/rationale in the minutes
Consensus Process
As a group setting standards on behalf of a community, QIBA Committees actively pursue Consensus.
- strictly speaking a vote/ballot can pass with a quorum of votes and a majority in favor, BUT
- a negative vote results in further discussion
- understand the reason for each negative vote and attempt to find a compromise or resolution that often allows everyone to vote in favor
- if after due diligence exploring compromises it is not possible, the chairs can accept the majority finding and the negative voters have had a chance to have their say and register their issues into the minutes
- a large number of abstentions also warrants discussion; it can indicate many people have:
- misgivings
- not been able to adequately evaluate the question
- a negative vote results in further discussion
Committee Leadership
- Coordinating Committees, Biomarker Committees and Task Forces are encouraged to have 2 or 3 leaders who are preferably drawn from diverse backgrounds (Researchers, Clinicians, Physicists, Vendors, Regulators, etc.)
- If not possible, committees are permitted to have some concentration but should discuss plans to expand stakeholder representation at least annually