Difference between revisions of "QIBA Protocol/Profile Implementation Feedback Process"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==<font color=red>Solicited Feedback after Publication of QIBA Documents</font>== | ==<font color=red>Solicited Feedback after Publication of QIBA Documents</font>== | ||
− | The purpose of this | + | The purpose of this step is to actively seek feedback on use of published QIBA documents in a formally organized "Field Test." |
− | A procedure is outlined below | + | A procedure is outlined below. |
− | |||
# Periodically, RSNA collects lists of people that may have used the document and/or professional societies that may have a particular relationship to the document. | # Periodically, RSNA collects lists of people that may have used the document and/or professional societies that may have a particular relationship to the document. |
Revision as of 15:08, 19 September 2012
Solicited Feedback during Implementation of QIBA Documents
This step collects feedback on use of the documents by users in the field, including clinical trialists, imaging scientists, pharma, CRO’s, etc.
QIBA Technical Committiees are interested in feedback on how well Protocols and Profiles work in practice. Therefore we solicit comments specifically from those that have used or are using them.
A procedure is outlined below.
- Periodically, RSNA collects lists of people that may have used the document, and/or professional societies that may have a particular interest in the document. The goal is to include a full range of users of the document, e.g., vendors/suppliers, clinical trialists, imaging scientists, pahrma, CRO's, etc.
- RSNA sends an announcement to the relevant mailing lists, including a:
- Link to the document
- Link to the QIBA Protocol/Profile Implementation Feedback Form.
- Commenters email a Feedback Form to (Joe Koudelik) at RSNA.
- RSNA collates all comments into a spreadsheet for review by the Technical Committee.
- Technical Committee decides what changes to make (if any) to the document and records resolution in a spreadsheet.
- Technical Committee determines whether to refer the document to the Modality Committee for re-publication of an updated version, whether to branch the document leaving the current version in place but spawning a derivative, or to retire the document.
- All resolution will be documented and made available.
Solicited Feedback after Publication of QIBA Documents
The purpose of this step is to actively seek feedback on use of published QIBA documents in a formally organized "Field Test."
A procedure is outlined below.
- Periodically, RSNA collects lists of people that may have used the document and/or professional societies that may have a particular relationship to the document.
- Technical Committee finalizes comment form that will be used in the survey.
- RSNA sends announcement to mailing lists
- Reminder copy of document that had been placed into field test
- Provide a link to the QIBA User Feedback Form
- Commenters email comments to RSNA at (Joe Koudelik)
- Include full range of users of the document, e.g., vendors/suppliers, clinical trialists, imaging scientists, pharma, CRO’s, etc. However, only people who have used document are included.
- Commenters are requested to use the provided comment form.
- RSNA collates all comments into a spreadsheet.
- Summarize range of feedback to the questions into a report for review by the Technical Committee provided by the secretariat.
- Technical Committee decides what changes to make (if any) to the document and whether to refer it to the Modality Committee for re-publication of an updated version, whether to branch the document leaving the current version in place but spawning a derivative, or to retire the document.
- Technical Committee records resolution in spreadsheet.
- Regardless of recommended status for this document, ensure that the results are made available to related activities.