Difference between revisions of "Stakeholder Contacts"

From QIBA Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
COCIR (European Trade Association representing the medical imaging, radiotherapy, health ICT and electromedical industries)
 
COCIR (European Trade Association representing the medical imaging, radiotherapy, health ICT and electromedical industries)
 +
:* Contact:
 +
 +
JIRA (Japan Medical Imaging and Radiological Systems Industries Association)
 
:* Contact:
 
:* Contact:
  

Revision as of 00:29, 18 August 2020

The Public Comment Process benefits significantly from getting feedback from a variety of different stakeholder groups.

This page is intended to collect names and contact information to facilitate outreach during any Stage but especially during Public Comment.

Radiologists

Technologists

AIUM (American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine) includes technologists.

  • Profile evaluation would likely go to the Technical Standards Committee, but should also go to the Clinical Standards Committee.
  • Contact:

Imaging Vendors

MITA (Medical Imaging Technology Alliance)

  • Contact:
  • MITA has specific "sections" for different modalities. Typically QIBA should target the relevant section.

COCIR (European Trade Association representing the medical imaging, radiotherapy, health ICT and electromedical industries)

  • Contact:

JIRA (Japan Medical Imaging and Radiological Systems Industries Association)

  • Contact:

Statisticians

Regulators

Physicists

AAPM (American Association of Physicists in Medicine)

  • CT Profile review has been coordinated by Dr. Cynthia McCollough

Core Labs

Clinical Trials

Other Organizations

EIBALL (European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance)

  • Contact:

J-QIBA (Japanese Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance)

  • Contact: