Difference between revisions of "Public Comment Process"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Period: 30 days | Period: 30 days | ||
| − | * Post PC draft of Document on the Wiki (author/secretariat) | + | * Post PC draft of Document on the Wiki ('''author/secretariat''') |
| − | * Send announcement to mailing lists (secretariat) | + | * Send announcement to mailing lists ('''secretariat''') |
** detail location of document to be reviewed, deadline for comment submission, method of submission | ** detail location of document to be reviewed, deadline for comment submission, method of submission | ||
** provide a link to the [[:Media:QIBA_Public_Comment_Template-2011.01.doc | QIBA Public Comment Template]] | ** provide a link to the [[:Media:QIBA_Public_Comment_Template-2011.01.doc | QIBA Public Comment Template]] | ||
| − | * Email comments to secretariat (Commenters) | + | * Email comments to secretariat ('''Commenters''') |
** commenters include committee members, other QIBA People, external bodies | ** commenters include committee members, other QIBA People, external bodies | ||
** this is the key point for asynchronous engagement | ** this is the key point for asynchronous engagement | ||
** please use the provided comment form | ** please use the provided comment form | ||
| − | * Collate all comments into a spreadsheet (secretariat/author) | + | * Collate all comments into a spreadsheet ('''secretariat/author''') |
** sort by line number and priority | ** sort by line number and priority | ||
| − | * Resolve comments with priority | + | * Resolve comments with priority Low ('''author''') |
| − | ** if any | + | ** if any Low comments prove problematic, elevate to Med |
| − | * Review | + | * Review Med & High comments ('''profile writing committee''') |
** walk through document | ** walk through document | ||
** each comment may be: | ** each comment may be: | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
*** rejected, committee does not agree with issue (document reason, e.g. out of scope, ) | *** rejected, committee does not agree with issue (document reason, e.g. out of scope, ) | ||
*** resolved, issue accepted but resolved differently than proposed | *** resolved, issue accepted but resolved differently than proposed | ||
| − | * Record resolution in spreadsheet | + | * Record resolution in spreadsheet ('''author''') |
| + | * Post resolution spreadsheet ('''author/secretariat''') | ||
Revision as of 01:21, 28 January 2011
Public Comment is intended to allow both regular participants in QIBA Activities and also those who don't have the time to dedicate to regular participation to contribute their thoughts on proposed specifications. Comments are accepted from all.
A procedure is outlined below listing what is done (by whom).
Period: 30 days
- Post PC draft of Document on the Wiki (author/secretariat)
- Send announcement to mailing lists (secretariat)
- detail location of document to be reviewed, deadline for comment submission, method of submission
- provide a link to the QIBA Public Comment Template
- Email comments to secretariat (Commenters)
- commenters include committee members, other QIBA People, external bodies
- this is the key point for asynchronous engagement
- please use the provided comment form
- Collate all comments into a spreadsheet (secretariat/author)
- sort by line number and priority
- Resolve comments with priority Low (author)
- if any Low comments prove problematic, elevate to Med
- Review Med & High comments (profile writing committee)
- walk through document
- each comment may be:
- accepted, proposed text accepted as is
- rejected, committee does not agree with issue (document reason, e.g. out of scope, )
- resolved, issue accepted but resolved differently than proposed
- Record resolution in spreadsheet (author)
- Post resolution spreadsheet (author/secretariat)