Difference between revisions of "Committee Procedures"

From QIBA Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Email Ballot: per CP-SC-003)
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<font color="red">NOTICE: These instructions are accessible on the QIBA Wiki as a historical reference only! Independent Profile Authoring Groups are required to oversee the various developmental stages from Draft to Public Comment to Consensus based on the current QUIC endorsement criteria, found HERE:</font> https://qibawiki.rsna.org/images/9/95/QUIC-Review-Criteria-for-New-Profiles-FINAL-v23SEPT2023.pdf.
 +
  
 
==Meeting Procedures==
 
==Meeting Procedures==
 
The goal is group consensus and the input and endorsement of imaging community stakeholders on major decisions.
 
The goal is group consensus and the input and endorsement of imaging community stakeholders on major decisions.
 +
 +
* When participation at a given meeting is not open to all committee members, (e.g., it takes place at an '''“invitation-only” face-to-face event and remote access is not provided for the committee meeting'''), that meeting '''will not be considered an official meeting''' of that committee.  No official decisions will be made and attendance will not count toward or against voting privileges.
 +
** The chair will need to ensure that attendance records are captured and submitted to the Profile Authoring Group members.
  
 
A record of committee decisions and rationale is necessary to be effective and learn.  
 
A record of committee decisions and rationale is necessary to be effective and learn.  
* ''Secretariat'' (RSNA) records minutes (call summaries) for committee meetings
+
* ''Profile Authoring Group scribe'' records minutes (call summaries) for meetings
* ''Secretariat'' maintains '''[[Committees|rosters for each committee]]''' indicating which members currently have '''[[Voting Privileges]]'''
+
* ''Chairs'' are strongly encouraged to support Profile Authoring Group scribes by reviewing/correcting the draft minutes circulated 
** ''Members'' who believe their attendance record is in error should contact the secretariat, preferably before the meeting
+
* ''Profile Authoring Group Chairs'' maintain '''[[Committees|rosters of the members of each committee]]''' and their participation.  Those details are used to determine which members currently have '''[[Voting Privileges]]'''
 +
** ''Members'' who believe their attendance record is in error should contact Profile Authoring Group Chairs.
  
 
==Voting==
 
==Voting==
Procedural decisions (such as whether to send a document to ballot) are voted on during meetings
+
Most committee work doesn't need a vote.  At the discretion of committee chairs and members, however, decisions can be put to a vote during meetings.  This also facilitates recording key decisions in the minutes.
  
* ''Chairs'' accept motions, seconds, discussion, and then call for a vote (see Roberts Rules if you need to get more elaborate)
+
* ''Chairs'' accept motions, seconds, discussion, and then call for a vote
* ''Members'' who have '''[[Voting Privileges]]''' count towards quorum and may vote
+
** At its simplest, the ''Chair'' asks for objections, then asks for abstentions, and "Profile Authoring Group scribe'' notes those names.  The rest of those present with voting privileges can safely be assumed to have voted in favor.
 +
* ''Members'' who have '''[[Voting Privileges]]''' count towards quorum and may vote.
 
* ''Chairs'' resolve negative votes and large numbers of abstentions per the '''[[Committee Procedures#Consensus Process|consensus process]]'''
 
* ''Chairs'' resolve negative votes and large numbers of abstentions per the '''[[Committee Procedures#Consensus Process|consensus process]]'''
** details of the resolution discussion in the minutes is desirable
+
** details of the resolution discussion in the minutes are desirable
* ''Secretariat'' records the motion, tally of those against/abstaining/in-favor, and the details of negative votes in the minutes
+
* ''Profile Authoring Group scribe'' records the motion, the tally of those against/abstaining/in-favor, and the details of negative votes in the minutes.
 +
** If attendance, eligibility and quorum cannot be determined during the meeting, vote results will be ratified after the call and entered into the minutes by the ''Profile Authoring Group scribe''.
  
 
==Email Ballot==
 
==Email Ballot==
Some decisions are put to ballot. This allows more deliberation on the subject material than a vote in committee.
+
Substantive decisions, such as whether a Profile is advanced to the next stage, are put to ballot. This allows more deliberation on the subject material than a vote in committee.
 +
 
 +
A committee may initiate an email ballot on a document by approving a motion to do so (i.e. officially deciding the document is ready for ballot).  Alternatively, Chairs may initiate email ballots at their own discretion after assuring appropriate discussion and review by the committee, and if there are multiple chairs then a simple majority of the chairs must approve the action.
  
* ''Chairs'' submit the ballot question and length of the ballot period to the Secretariat
+
* ''Chairs'' submit the ballot question and length of the ballot period to RSNA Staff
 
** The ballot period may be specified by the particular procedure that calls for a ballot
 
** The ballot period may be specified by the particular procedure that calls for a ballot
** It is generally not less than 14 days to allow for members away on vacation
+
** The ballot period is generally not less than 14 days to allow adequate time to review the material and vote
** If reviewing lengthy documents or collecting feedback within member organizations is involved 30 days or more is better
+
** If reviewing lengthy documents or collecting feedback within member organizations is involved 30 days is suggested for the ballot period
* ''Secretariat'' emails the ballot to all members with '''[[Voting Privileges]]''' on the committee making the decision
+
* ''Profile Authoring Group scribe'' emails the ballot to all members with '''[[Voting Privileges]]''' on the committee making the decision
* ''Secretariat'' emails a notification of ineligibility to the rest of the members of the committee making the decision  
+
* ''Profile Authoring Group scribe'' emails a notification of ineligibility to the rest of the members of the committee making the decision  
 
** Members who do not have Voting Privileges will thus be aware of the ballot and are still permitted to submit comments
 
** Members who do not have Voting Privileges will thus be aware of the ballot and are still permitted to submit comments
**  Members who believe their attendance record is in error can review of their attendance with the secretariat and if they are found to be eligible will be sent a ballot
+
**  Members who believe their attendance record is in error can review of their attendance with the Profile Authoring Group scribe or Chairs, and if they are found to be eligible will be sent a ballot
* ''Secretariat'' compiles the ballot responses and comments for the Chairs  
+
* ''Profile Authoring Group scribe'' compiles the ballot responses and comments for the Chairs
* ''Chairs'' ratify the resulting tally in the next committee meeting
+
**  o At the discretion of the Chairs, comments submitted by non-voting members may be stricken
** this includes resolving negative votes and large numbers of abstentions per the consensus process
+
* ''Chairs'' ratify the resulting tally and comments within a reasonable period of time (preferably in the next committee meeting) per the consensus process
* ''Secretariat'' records resolution results/rationale in the minutes
+
* ''Profile Authoring Group scribe'' records resolution results/rationale in the minutes
 +
 
 +
==Quorum==
 +
For a vote or ballot to be valid, at least 50% of those with voting privileges must have participated (by either voting in favor, objecting, or abstaining).
  
 
==Consensus Process==
 
==Consensus Process==
As a group setting standards on behalf of a community, QIBA Committees actively pursue Consensus.
+
As a group setting standards on behalf of a community, the Profile Authoring Groups actively seek to pursue Consensus.
  
* strictly speaking a vote/ballot can pass with a quorum of votes and a majority in favor, BUT
+
* a vote/ballot passes with a quorum of votes and a majority of votes in favor, but
** a '''negative vote results in further discussion'''
+
** a '''negative vote or votes should result in subsequent discussion''' to
*** '''understand the reason''' for each negative vote and '''attempt to find a compromise or resolution''' that often allows everyone to vote in favor
+
*** '''understand the reason''' for such (a) negative vote(s) and '''attempt to find a compromise or resolution'''; associated edits to the document under ballot do not typically require re-balloting
*** if after due diligence exploring compromises it is not possible, the chairs can accept the majority finding and the negative voters have had a chance to have their say and register their issues into the minutes
+
** a '''large number of abstentions''' may also warrant discussion; it may indicate many people have:
** a '''large number of abstentions''' also warrants discussion; it can indicate many people have:
 
 
*** misgivings
 
*** misgivings
 
*** not been able to adequately evaluate the question
 
*** not been able to adequately evaluate the question
  
==Committee Leadership==
+
Participants concerned that a reasonable attempt at consensus has not been made should consider raising the issue with the chair(s) of the Profile Authoring Group.
* Coordinating Committees, Biomarker Committees and Task Forces are encouraged to have 2 or 3 leaders who are preferably drawn from diverse backgrounds (Researchers, Clinicians, Physicists, Vendors, Regulators, etc.
 
** If not possible, committees are permitted to have some concentration but should discuss plans to expand stakeholder representation at least annually
 
  
 +
==Profile Authoring Group Leadership==
 +
*Profile Authoring Groups are encouraged to have 2 or 3 leaders who are preferably drawn from diverse backgrounds (Researchers, Clinicians, Physicists, Vendors, Regulators, etc.) 
 +
** If not possible, groups are permitted to have some concentration but should discuss plans to expand the breadth of stakeholder representation at least annually
  
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==
 
* [[Committees|QIBA Committees]]
 
* [[Committees|QIBA Committees]]

Latest revision as of 17:32, 19 January 2024

NOTICE: These instructions are accessible on the QIBA Wiki as a historical reference only! Independent Profile Authoring Groups are required to oversee the various developmental stages from Draft to Public Comment to Consensus based on the current QUIC endorsement criteria, found HERE: https://qibawiki.rsna.org/images/9/95/QUIC-Review-Criteria-for-New-Profiles-FINAL-v23SEPT2023.pdf.


Meeting Procedures

The goal is group consensus and the input and endorsement of imaging community stakeholders on major decisions.

  • When participation at a given meeting is not open to all committee members, (e.g., it takes place at an “invitation-only” face-to-face event and remote access is not provided for the committee meeting), that meeting will not be considered an official meeting of that committee. No official decisions will be made and attendance will not count toward or against voting privileges.
    • The chair will need to ensure that attendance records are captured and submitted to the Profile Authoring Group members.

A record of committee decisions and rationale is necessary to be effective and learn.

  • Profile Authoring Group scribe records minutes (call summaries) for meetings
  • Chairs are strongly encouraged to support Profile Authoring Group scribes by reviewing/correcting the draft minutes circulated
  • Profile Authoring Group Chairs maintain rosters of the members of each committee and their participation. Those details are used to determine which members currently have Voting Privileges
    • Members who believe their attendance record is in error should contact Profile Authoring Group Chairs.

Voting

Most committee work doesn't need a vote. At the discretion of committee chairs and members, however, decisions can be put to a vote during meetings. This also facilitates recording key decisions in the minutes.

  • Chairs accept motions, seconds, discussion, and then call for a vote
    • At its simplest, the Chair asks for objections, then asks for abstentions, and "Profile Authoring Group scribe notes those names. The rest of those present with voting privileges can safely be assumed to have voted in favor.
  • Members who have Voting Privileges count towards quorum and may vote.
  • Chairs resolve negative votes and large numbers of abstentions per the consensus process
    • details of the resolution discussion in the minutes are desirable
  • Profile Authoring Group scribe records the motion, the tally of those against/abstaining/in-favor, and the details of negative votes in the minutes.
    • If attendance, eligibility and quorum cannot be determined during the meeting, vote results will be ratified after the call and entered into the minutes by the Profile Authoring Group scribe.

Email Ballot

Substantive decisions, such as whether a Profile is advanced to the next stage, are put to ballot. This allows more deliberation on the subject material than a vote in committee.

A committee may initiate an email ballot on a document by approving a motion to do so (i.e. officially deciding the document is ready for ballot). Alternatively, Chairs may initiate email ballots at their own discretion after assuring appropriate discussion and review by the committee, and if there are multiple chairs then a simple majority of the chairs must approve the action.

  • Chairs submit the ballot question and length of the ballot period to RSNA Staff
    • The ballot period may be specified by the particular procedure that calls for a ballot
    • The ballot period is generally not less than 14 days to allow adequate time to review the material and vote
    • If reviewing lengthy documents or collecting feedback within member organizations is involved 30 days is suggested for the ballot period
  • Profile Authoring Group scribe emails the ballot to all members with Voting Privileges on the committee making the decision
  • Profile Authoring Group scribe emails a notification of ineligibility to the rest of the members of the committee making the decision
    • Members who do not have Voting Privileges will thus be aware of the ballot and are still permitted to submit comments
    • Members who believe their attendance record is in error can review of their attendance with the Profile Authoring Group scribe or Chairs, and if they are found to be eligible will be sent a ballot
  • Profile Authoring Group scribe compiles the ballot responses and comments for the Chairs
    • o At the discretion of the Chairs, comments submitted by non-voting members may be stricken
  • Chairs ratify the resulting tally and comments within a reasonable period of time (preferably in the next committee meeting) per the consensus process
  • Profile Authoring Group scribe records resolution results/rationale in the minutes

Quorum

For a vote or ballot to be valid, at least 50% of those with voting privileges must have participated (by either voting in favor, objecting, or abstaining).

Consensus Process

As a group setting standards on behalf of a community, the Profile Authoring Groups actively seek to pursue Consensus.

  • a vote/ballot passes with a quorum of votes and a majority of votes in favor, but
    • a negative vote or votes should result in subsequent discussion to
      • understand the reason for such (a) negative vote(s) and attempt to find a compromise or resolution; associated edits to the document under ballot do not typically require re-balloting
    • a large number of abstentions may also warrant discussion; it may indicate many people have:
      • misgivings
      • not been able to adequately evaluate the question

Participants concerned that a reasonable attempt at consensus has not been made should consider raising the issue with the chair(s) of the Profile Authoring Group.

Profile Authoring Group Leadership

  • Profile Authoring Groups are encouraged to have 2 or 3 leaders who are preferably drawn from diverse backgrounds (Researchers, Clinicians, Physicists, Vendors, Regulators, etc.)
    • If not possible, groups are permitted to have some concentration but should discuss plans to expand the breadth of stakeholder representation at least annually

See Also