Difference between revisions of "CT Acquisition Protocol Groundwork"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
** Maps corresponding differences in terms and header details | ** Maps corresponding differences in terms and header details | ||
* ACRIN 6678 is a screening oriented (more concern on dose) that also does similar work | * ACRIN 6678 is a screening oriented (more concern on dose) that also does similar work | ||
| + | ** Does not appear to have the comprehensive table of parameters that NLST does | ||
===Reviewing Acquisition Protocols=== | ===Reviewing Acquisition Protocols=== | ||
Revision as of 17:19, 15 December 2008
Goal:
Proposed Protocol
Q. Should we propose two protocols 1) for high resolution; and (2) for world-wide trials in patients with late stage disease?
Related Work
Defining Acquisition Protocols
ACRIN has defined a number of protocols for CT-based clinical trials.
- CT Lung Specific protocols and QA procedures are discussed in work done for the ACRIN National Lung Screening Trial
- Table provides comparable acq. parameters for different scanners
- Maps corresponding differences in terms and header details
- ACRIN 6678 is a screening oriented (more concern on dose) that also does similar work
- Does not appear to have the comprehensive table of parameters that NLST does
Reviewing Acquisition Protocols
UPICT is preparing a process for proposing/reviewing protocols and has access to experts for reviews.
It would likely be beneficial to review our proposed protocols with them.
Storing/Transfering Acquisition Protocols
DICOM is working on a format for encoding acquisition protocols as DICOM objects which can be stored/retrieved.
Field Testing Acquisition Protocols
Q. Should we broadcast our proposed protocols for general use in pharma trials that are starting up now, before we complete our profiles and groundwork?